Wiki source code of 04. Werk multilateraal samen met energiebedrijven en vendors om een evenwichtigere kostenopbouw te realiseren.
Last modified by Ad Min on 2021/04/24 22:49
Show last authors
| author | version | line-number | content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ((( | ||
| 2 | (% class="box infomessage" %) | ||
| 3 | Research for the UK government by LucidCatalyst shows large differences in capex (capital expenditure) for identical power stations in Western and non-Western countries.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^16^^>>path:#sdfootnote16sym||name="sdfootnote16anc"]](%%) An important difference is the interest rate which we discussed under point 2. Other cost aspects also show major discrepancies between Western and non-Western reactors. The research establishes a relationship between a negative government influence and higher costs. We propose that EZK, I&W, ANVS, energy companies and potential reactor partners work together to mitigate these costs as much as possible. | ||
| 4 | ))) | ||
| 5 | |||
| 6 | [[image:ch4_fig1.svg||alt="ch4_fig1"]] | ||
| 7 | |||
| 8 | Considering the capital expenditures of Western and non-Western reactors, we see great differences. Consider for instance, the differences between EPR projects in Finland, France, Great Britain and two units of the same reactor type in China. We believe that this skewed growth can be corrected by multilateral cooperation between the government, energy companies and vendors. | ||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | A representative of the CNNC (China National Nuclear Corporation) showed—at the IAEA international conference on climate change and the role of nuclear power in 2019—that China has started to build more efficiently by gaining experience and structuring the nuclear construction industry on efficiency. For example, the work has been divided into civil works, installation, hoisting, and concrete works.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^17^^>>path:#sdfootnote17sym||name="sdfootnote17anc"]] | ||
| 11 | |||
| 12 | [[image:ch4_fig2.svg||alt="ch4_fig2"]] | ||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | Above we see a reproduction of Figure 9 from the ETI 'Nuclear Cost Drivers Summary Report'.[[(% class="wikiinternallink wikiinternallink" %)^^18^^>>path:#sdfootnote18sym||name="sdfootnote18anc"]](%%) This graph shows a "genre" comparison between similar light water reactors built in Europe & North America (EU&NA) and in the rest of the world (ROW). The right column (DELTA) is our own addition to the graph from the ETI report and it shows the differences between EU&NA and ROW columns. There are significant cost reduction opportunities in the following rubrics: //"Financing During Construction", "Owner's Costs”, “Indirect Services Costs" //and //“Direct Construction Costs: Labor”.// | ||
| 15 | |||
| 16 | As you can clearly see, there is a lot of headway to be made in all four rubrics. particularly, the government has a role to play in financing the nuclear power plant; in (internationally) harmonizing the licensing framework and by making optimal use of serialized production & manufacturing of components (Indirect Services Costs). | ||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | ---- | ||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | [[16>>path:#sdfootnote16anc||name="sdfootnote16sym"]] [[http:~~/~~/eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/165805/>>url:http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/165805/]] | ||
| 21 | [[17>>path:#sdfootnote17anc||name="sdfootnote17sym"]] [[http:~~/~~/en.cnnc.com.cn/2019-11/22/c_447346.htm>>url:http://en.cnnc.com.cn/2019-11/22/c_447346.htm]] | ||
| 22 | [[18>>path:#sdfootnote18anc||name="sdfootnote18sym"]] [[https:~~/~~/www.eti.co.uk/library/the-eti-nuclear-cost-drivers-project-summary-report>>url:https://www.eti.co.uk/library/the-eti-nuclear-cost-drivers-project-summary-report]] |